Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 04:26

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Quis sed officia eum accusantium animi.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
NASA Switches to Backup Fuel Line After Psyche Thruster Glitch - Gizmodo
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Verizon announces wild new offer to win back angry customers - TheStreet
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Psyche keeps its date with an asteroid, but now it’s running in backup mode - Ars Technica
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
First quantum-mechanical model of quasicrystals reveals why they exist - Phys.org
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Beware: There’s a new Trump-RFK Jr. epidemic brewing - NJ.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How Fast Can The Suzuki Hayabusa Really Go? Here's What Riders Have Clocked - Jalopnik